Category Archives: Local Politics

End of the bypass

Haven’t posted in a while, just busy getting on with the day job and trying to make sure that we can get through to the other side of the forthcoming recession.

A lot of interesting things politically over the summer, the most interesting for me being the shelving of the Ormskirk Bypass for another 10 years. Not quite as grim as the local papers put it, the report to the Lancashire Local Committee said that it might be reconsidered as early as 2016 (though it does say that funding would still be unlikely). However, given the projection of traffic in 2012 that the County traffic engineers presented, it is imperative that minds are urgently turned to a viable alternative for Ormskirk.

At the end of the day it comes down to cash available to put any scheme into place, and it must be regrettable that a reported £1.4million was spent putting this new set of plans together. Doubly so, given that the recent speculation, reports and surveys came two years after the government had ranked the scheme in the third quartile of transport projects for the North West, where it remains.

It is admirable that it was believed that force of personality alone might make the bypass happen, but ultimately all that money invested in drawing up the plans and lobbying government was wasted.

That cash would have been better spent on trying to find a viable alternative. I’m no fan of the “road across the park”, but at least it shows that there are alternatives. There are much better minds that mine applying themselves to finding new and novel ways of addressing traffic problems, and that is the kind of thinking that we need in West Lancs. Our local politicians need to be pressing the County Council to start the ball rolling on a new scheme for the town.

Merseyrail presses Network Rail to handover running tracks

This, in the Liverpool Daily Post says that transport chiefs in Merseyside are lobbying for control of the railway tracks. Apparently they’ve been pushing for the past two years for this, and despite the headline, it doesn’t look like there’s been much movement forward in the idea. However, it seems that Merseyrail are still pushing for it. And good on them for trying.

The only way that sub-regional areas will get the railways that they need is if there is control at the sub-regional level. It would make perfect sense for Merseyrail to take control of the lines – in exactly the same way that it would make sense for GMPTE to control the Greater Manchester side (and while we’re at it, a Lancashire Passenger Transport Executive would be good!)

Of course we then get back to the wider city-region / metropolitan county council debate, but that’s not a bad thing. Where there is sub-regional decision making, there should be appropriate representation.

In the meantime, good luck to Merseyrail.

Hung parliament speculation

Found in my drafts from a couple of weeks ago….

Peter Kellner speculates on the Progress blog about what might happen if there is a hung parliament after the next GE. Rather than the usual stuff about jumping into bed with the Fib Dems it sets out a couple of scenarios and what might happen in each.

It’s a much more thoughtful article than I’ve seen in the past which might indicate that we need to be realistically planning for these eventualities.

Rather than delete it, I’m posting it now because I notice that Rob Alcock mentioned it here and acknowledges it as a useful article – even if I would disagree with the description of Progress as a “New Labour think-tank-cum-ginger-group”!!

West Lancs District Council – Committee Papers online

A useful link for anyone interested in West Lancs District Council:

http://webdocs.westlancsdc.gov.uk/Coins/

I don’t think I’ve mentioned it here before, but this system is one of the most interesting on the WLDC site. You can get papers for all the public meetings, information about councillors and which committees they sit on.

For example, next week’s Executive Overview and Scrutiny committee’s meeting agenda and papers are here. Ironically however, the interesting stuff – the papers about the Skem Town Centre project and those relating to Firbeck and Findon, aren’t yet available…. ho hum!

between the lines

I thought things had gone very quiet for local journalists blogging since David Sudworth shuffled off his journalistic coil, but I’m pleased to see that Robert Alcock has stepped into his shoes with his take on the local political scene. Of course, I’m seven months late noticing this – so everyone will have come across this already.

It’s mostly about Southport politics, but I’ve recently noticed his name in the advertiser, so perhaps we’ll see some postings about the political life in West Lancs. Regardless, it’s a good read – keep up the good work Rob :-)

FC United v Skelmersdale

Came across this clip with the goals from last weeks play-off final. Tried to convince the family that we should go, but Lily’s operation meant that it wasn’t a go-er. To be honest it was one of those games where I’d prefer both teams to be promoted, but I was disappointed to see Skem beaten by such a margin. They did a fantastic job last season, so promotion next year, perhaps?

Am planning to take Joel to see Skem FC once he’s a bit older.

Leyland Labour Blog

Interesting blog being maintained by Leyland Labour. Might be a useful template for West Lancs to follow. I like the broader non-labour items: local people and the notice board.

My only criticism is that there isn’t the ability to post comments, which might turn some people off. A site like this would surely benefit if there was a visible dialogue with the electorate.

A longer view

I’ve been looking back over the results over the past eight elections (excluding the by-election in Up Holland a couple of years ago). I’ve plotted two sets of results below – first the share of the vote across the District and secondly the share of the vote across the constituency.

Firstly across the District:

district01to08.jpg

For 2001 and 2005 when there weren’t District elections, I’ve put in the County election results instead. The differences in the trends are most likely due to the General Election being held on the same day.

For the West Lancs constituency area:

constituency01to08.jpg

These show the total votes cast for each party in the District elections. For 2001 and 2005 the Parliamentary election results are shown.

Across the district there is a higher Conservative vote compared to the West Lancs constituency – that’s because the district includes the “Northern Parishes” which are in South Ribble constituency. The Tory vote in that area is proportionally much higher than in the rest of the District and consequently skew the figures.

For me, the interesting figures are within the constituency. Between 2001 and 2005 the two parties were virtually neck and neck. However, since 2005 there has been a much larger gap between Labour and Conservative – 10% in 2008.

The gap between the two parties isn’t enough to turn around the 14% lead from the last General Election, but if a strong third party candidate stood, then it could push things further away from Labour. As we saw this year – there were double digit swings in some wards to UKIP, Independent and in the case of Tanhouse, to the Conservatives.

The danger is twofold. If people want to protest and vote for a third party, then it makes a Tory victory a lot more likely. However, if they just switch directly from Labour to the Conservatives, as in Tanhouse, then Labour is in real trouble.

Election results – behind the headlines

Sadly, last Thursday was a bad day for Labour in West Lancs. We lost two excellent Labour councillors in Cynthia Dereli and Maggie Skilling. I’ve worked with Maggie for a few years – she was our local councillor when we lived in Up Holland and she was brilliant. Both Cynthia and Maggie worked tirelessly for their wards. They were well known and amongst those I’ve spoken to, there is genuine surprise in both Up Holland and Burscough that they lost.

No doubt, the local papers will just report the headline changes of the Labour losses, but the headlines hide some of the more interesting results. For me, the headlines were:

• The result in Tanhouse ward was the worst ever for Labour in Skelmersdale. Going to a recount, Labour won the ward by just 34 votes in the end. A swing of 21% to the Tories – right in the heart of Skelmersdale’s new town.

• The swings against us in Burscough and Up Holland were small but enought to count, around 2% compared to swings of 17% against us in Ashurst and 14% in Skem North. The collapse in support was in other areas, not necessarily where we lost the seats.

• Labour’s share of the vote dropped in all wards except Burcough East and Tarleton. In Burscough East the vote increased by 0.5% while in Tarleton there was an increase of 3.09%.

• Local Greens failed to capitalise on the drop in Labour support.

There is good news for Labour. Where there was a large swing away from Labour it generally didn’t go to the Tories. Instead it went to the local independent or to UKIP. If this is a protest vote, then Labour needs to listen and learn and rebuild trust with this electorate.

However, someone needs to take a long hard look at the result in Tanhouse. The last bad result was in Skem North when the independent lost by 58 votes against the then leader of the Labour Group. This year’s result is worse by an order of magnitude. The Labour vote held up, but the fact that a reinvigorated Tory vote made the result so close has to be a concern for all of us who want Labour to be winning in West Lancs.

Paul Cotterill, the Labour councillor for Bickerstaffe, has a clear view of what can be done to improve things, and I think he is right.